Tuesday, 9 June 2015.
Commercialization of the Organ Transplantation Authority
There is a shortage of donor organs in most countries of the world (Cherry, 2005). The explanation for this is the gap between the organ that is required and the organ donation. Thus, this has led to an increase in the number of black markets in which human tissues and organs are sold. In addition, this raises the question of the use of tissue from post-mortem and transplantation. It also raises questions about the commercialization of human organs (Kannyakonil, 2005). This paper presents various views on the commercialization of organ transplants. The document also presents the correct actions concerning this practice
Supporters claim that people are born in families, and that makes them community resources. Thus, human bodies should be treated as community resources. Legalization of this practice will reduce the tensions that family members have against relatives after organ donation (Cherry, 2005). Thus, staff members will be able to donate their organs without being subject to the requirements of their relatives
In addition, the authors note that this practice should be legalized, but that strict limitations must be imposed. They claim that this is different from the illegal market of authorities, as the security of the donor will be increased. There will also be an even distribution of bodies (Kannyakonil, 2005). This means that in such arrangements the prices of organs will be on average at the level of annual wages. Thus, donors are not just going to be poor but also rich
The argument of the opponents is that commercialization of organs will encourage the poor to transfer organs in such a way that they are
According to the opponents of the commercialization of the organs, children are in a very vulnerable position, as they are easily coerciled into the miliesion of the authorities. There are parents who would have more children so that they could use them for commercial purposes. The argument of the opponents is that it would mean an abuse of the moral standards of the present. They provide that incentives should not be offered to people so that they can sell organs (Cherry, 2005). There are cases where the sale may cause poor health or death. This will also reduce the community’s values. It would be unethical and children’s rights would be violated. The conclusion of the opponents is that the donor organs should be charitable
On the basis of these arguments, each side has its drawbacks and advantages. However, ethical standards provide the best solutions for this topic. Commercialization of this practice will make money the main incentive. People will reject moral values, including goodwill and charity, and will offer only monetary values (Kanniyakonil, 2005). People who are less privileged in society, such as mentally ill and children, will also be used for financial gain. This will meet ethical standards and exploit
The normative principle of the totality of states can be justified only when the functional integrity of the donor is supported (Kannyakonil, 2005). The essence of virtue is that the basis of a donor’s decision should be their nature, not the general opinion. This means that the sale of a body to an economic position or value is a moral one (Qannyaktoby, 2005). In addition, it is important to avoid exploitation and to ensure the informed consent of the donor. If a decision is not taken on the decision of the donor alone, then those who make decisions will not respect the benefactor. Children and the mentally ill should not be used in such donations because they cannot make decisions on their own (Cherry, 2005). Charity must be preserved, and they should donate organs free of charge. People shouldn’t have the obligation to do this
Finally, the commercialization of organs should not be applied, as human organs should not be sold. People should not treat them as they do with commodities, as it is morally unacceptable (Kanniyakonil, 2005). It violates human dignity. He also burned the spirit of altruism. It’s important for everyone to teach others how to value. Only applicants can donate organs. The donation must also be made in a charitable way to help the suffering individual (Cherry, 2005). The donor must be assured that they will not be exposed to risk while they heal it. The point is that they should be carefully checked to ensure that they are in good condition
Vishev, M. J. (2005).
Kanniakonia, S. (2005).